DUNLIN RC2

Post by Matthew Peters
I just uploaded a new release candidate for DUNLIN (1.2.2) into the
files section of this google group. I deleted the previous one, so the
one that is there, and says it was uploaded at 8:10, is the one to
try.
wrt to the "going out on the web for no schemalocation" problem, I
if (strstr(file_name,"2003-02-11.xsd")) {
xmldas->xsdHelperPtr->defineFile(file_name, false);
} else {
xmldas->xsdHelperPtr->defineFile(file_name, true);
}
i.e., for our soap and wsdl xsds, don't go out, for others, do.
Ok, Matthew, pragmatic as ever. It looks like the real fix is going to

take a little time. Thanks for respinning the RC.

Simon

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "phpsoa" group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa-/***@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to phpsoa-unsubscribe-/***@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Graham Charters

2007-06-21 21:40:19 UTC

Hi Matthew,

Thanks for fixing the wsdl schema fetching problem and spinning RC2.
It all looks good to me on Windows. Unit tests all pass (phpt and
phpunit). Service generation for wsdl, xmlrpc and jsonrpc all work.
Json-rpc mail example runs. Ebay soap example runs and caching works.

Regards,

Graham.

take a little time. Thanks for respinning the RC.
Simon

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "phpsoa" group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa-/***@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to phpsoa-unsubscribe-/***@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

simonslaws-gM/Ye1E23mwN+

2007-06-22 07:39:16 UTC

Post by Graham Charters
Hi Matthew,
Thanks for fixing the wsdl schema fetching problem and spinning RC2.
It all looks good to me on Windows. Unit tests all pass (phpt and
phpunit). Service generation for wsdl, xmlrpc and jsonrpc all work.
Json-rpc mail example runs. Ebay soap example runs and caching works.
Regards,
Graham.

take a little time. Thanks for respinning the RC.
Simon

On FC6 I see 5 unit test failures and 1 phpt failure. They seem to be
to do with modification of the order of namespace definitions on
generated XML, for example,

5) testGETForm(SCA_RestRpcTest)
Failed asserting that <text> is equal to <text>.
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
-<HelloType xsi:type="HelloType" xmlns:tns="http://www.example.org/
Hello" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns="http://www.example.org/Hello"><name>name</name><greeting>Hello
Fred</greeting><reversed>derF olleH</reversed></HelloType>
+<HelloType xmlns="http://www.example.org/Hello" xsi:type="HelloType"
xmlns:tns="http://www.example.org/Hello" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/
2001/XMLSchema-instance"><name>name</name><greeting>Hello Fred</
greeting><reversed>derF olleH</reversed></HelloType>

/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/SCA/phpunit/RestRpc/
RestRpcTest.php:95
/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/TestSuite.php:41
/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/TestSuite.php:58
/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/AllTests.php:28

I'm assuming this is to do with the WSDL validation changes but I
thought the test expect results had caught up with this. They don't
stop the samples running though.

I also have a problem running one of the JSONRPC samples which I think
is a configuration problem. Give me a little time to investigate this.

Simon

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "phpsoa" group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa-/***@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to phpsoa-unsubscribe-/***@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

simonslaws-gM/Ye1E23mwN+

2007-06-22 08:08:45 UTC

take a little time. Thanks for respinning the RC.
Simon

On FC6 I see 5 unit test failures and 1 phpt failure. They seem to be
to do with modification of the order of namespace definitions on
generated XML, for example,
5) testGETForm(SCA_RestRpcTest)
Failed asserting that <text> is equal to <text>.
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
-<HelloType xsi:type="HelloType" xmlns:tns="http://www.example.org/
Hello" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns="http://www.example.org/Hello"><name>name</name><greeting>Hello
Fred</greeting><reversed>derF olleH</reversed></HelloType>
+<HelloType xmlns="http://www.example.org/Hello" xsi:type="HelloType"
xmlns:tns="http://www.example.org/Hello" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/
2001/XMLSchema-instance"><name>name</name><greeting>Hello Fred</
greeting><reversed>derF olleH</reversed></HelloType>
/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/SCA/phpunit/RestRpc/
RestRpcTest.php:95
/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/TestSuite.php:41
/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/TestSuite.php:58
/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/AllTests.php:28
I'm assuming this is to do with the WSDL validation changes but I
thought the test expect results had caught up with this. They don't
stop the samples running though.
I also have a problem running one of the JSONRPC samples which I think
is a configuration problem. Give me a little time to investigate this.
Simon

So I have all the examples running ok now (was a curl config issue) so
there can't be much wrong with it. Unit tests still fail. I can't just
go fix the expected output for the tests though if you are not seeing
these failures so I would like to know why our platforms are producing
different output. Here's what I'm running.

Fedora Core 6
PHP 5.2.0
libxml 2.6.29

Simon

Simon

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "phpsoa" group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa-/***@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to phpsoa-unsubscribe-/***@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Graham Charters

2007-06-22 08:14:56 UTC

Hi Simon, can you post what you're seeing for one of the failing unit
test for comparison?

Graham.

take a little time. Thanks for respinning the RC.
Simon

On FC6 I see 5 unit test failures and 1 phpt failure. They seem to be
to do with modification of the order of namespace definitions on
generated XML, for example,
5) testGETForm(SCA_RestRpcTest)
Failed asserting that <text> is equal to <text>.
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
-<HelloType xsi:type="HelloType" xmlns:tns="http://www.example.org/
Hello" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns="http://www.example.org/Hello"><name>name</name><greeting>Hello
Fred</greeting><reversed>derF olleH</reversed></HelloType>
+<HelloType xmlns="http://www.example.org/Hello" xsi:type="HelloType"
xmlns:tns="http://www.example.org/Hello" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/
2001/XMLSchema-instance"><name>name</name><greeting>Hello Fred</
greeting><reversed>derF olleH</reversed></HelloType>
/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/SCA/phpunit/RestRpc/
RestRpcTest.php:95
/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/TestSuite.php:41
/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/TestSuite.php:58
/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/AllTests.php:28
I'm assuming this is to do with the WSDL validation changes but I
thought the test expect results had caught up with this. They don't
stop the samples running though.
I also have a problem running one of the JSONRPC samples which I think
is a configuration problem. Give me a little time to investigate this.
Simon

simonslaws-gM/Ye1E23mwN+

2007-06-22 08:42:52 UTC

Post by Graham Charters
Hi Simon, can you post what you're seeing for one of the failing unit
test for comparison?
Graham.

take a little time. Thanks for respinning the RC.
Simon

On FC6 I see 5 unit test failures and 1 phpt failure. They seem to be
to do with modification of the order of namespace definitions on
generated XML, for example,
5) testGETForm(SCA_RestRpcTest)
Failed asserting that <text> is equal to <text>.
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
-<HelloType xsi:type="HelloType" xmlns:tns="http://www.example.org/
Hello" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns="http://www.example.org/Hello"><name>name</name><greeting>Hello
Fred</greeting><reversed>derF olleH</reversed></HelloType>
+<HelloType xmlns="http://www.example.org/Hello" xsi:type="HelloType"
xmlns:tns="http://www.example.org/Hello" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/
2001/XMLSchema-instance"><name>name</name><greeting>Hello Fred</
greeting><reversed>derF olleH</reversed></HelloType>
/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/SCA/phpunit/RestRpc/
RestRpcTest.php:95
/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/TestSuite.php:41
/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/TestSuite.php:58
/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/AllTests.php:28
I'm assuming this is to do with the WSDL validation changes but I
thought the test expect results had caught up with this. They don't
stop the samples running though.
I also have a problem running one of the JSONRPC samples which I think
is a configuration problem. Give me a little time to investigate this.
Simon

There is one in my original post

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "phpsoa" group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa-/***@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to phpsoa-unsubscribe-/***@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Graham Charters

2007-06-22 09:13:54 UTC

So there is :-) . Strange this it's just the order in which the
xsi:type and xmlns:tns are written out. Given that, I would say it's
good to go, but we need to get to the bottom of why the order is
different between Windows and Linux to avoid this in future releases.

Agree? Disagree?

Graham.

Post by Graham Charters
Hi Simon, can you post what you're seeing for one of the failing unit
test for comparison?
Graham.

take a little time. Thanks for respinning the RC.
Simon

On FC6 I see 5 unit test failures and 1 phpt failure. They seem to be
to do with modification of the order of namespace definitions on
generated XML, for example,
5) testGETForm(SCA_RestRpcTest)
Failed asserting that <text> is equal to <text>.
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
-<HelloType xsi:type="HelloType" xmlns:tns="http://www.example.org/
Hello" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns="http://www.example.org/Hello"><name>name</name><greeting>Hello
Fred</greeting><reversed>derF olleH</reversed></HelloType>
+<HelloType xmlns="http://www.example.org/Hello" xsi:type="HelloType"
xmlns:tns="http://www.example.org/Hello" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/
2001/XMLSchema-instance"><name>name</name><greeting>Hello Fred</
greeting><reversed>derF olleH</reversed></HelloType>
/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/SCA/phpunit/RestRpc/
RestRpcTest.php:95
/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/TestSuite.php:41
/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/TestSuite.php:58
/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/AllTests.php:28
I'm assuming this is to do with the WSDL validation changes but I
thought the test expect results had caught up with this. They don't
stop the samples running though.
I also have a problem running one of the JSONRPC samples which I think
is a configuration problem. Give me a little time to investigate this.
Simon

There is one in my original post

simonslaws-gM/Ye1E23mwN+

2007-06-22 09:28:38 UTC

Post by Graham Charters
So there is :-) . Strange this it's just the order in which the
xsi:type and xmlns:tns are written out. Given that, I would say it's
good to go, but we need to get to the bottom of why the order is
different between Windows and Linux to avoid this in future releases.
Agree? Disagree?
Graham.

Post by Graham Charters
Hi Simon, can you post what you're seeing for one of the failing unit
test for comparison?
Graham.