Discussion:
Time to release FULMAR: what should be in it?
Matthew Peters
2007-11-21 17:41:20 UTC
Permalink
It has been over two months since our last release and it is time we
did another one. We have been a bit quiet recently, though, and have
only three fixes in FULMAR at the moment.

See http://groups.google.com/group/phpsoa/web/contents-of-release-from-fulmar-branch

What else should we be fixing as a priority before releasing FULMAR?

Matthew
Tom
2007-11-22 09:04:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matthew Peters
What else should we be fixing as a priority before releasing FULMAR?
Line 24 SCA_BindingFactory.php:
if (!class_exists('SCA_Binding_Factory',)) {

should be:
if (!class_exists('SCA_Binding_Factory', false)) {
simonslaws-gM/Ye1E23mwN+
2007-11-22 10:51:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tom
Post by Matthew Peters
What else should we be fixing as a priority before releasing FULMAR?
if (!class_exists('SCA_Binding_Factory',)) {
if (!class_exists('SCA_Binding_Factory', false)) {
I see over on the Tuscany list that Pete is looking into applying the
patch to allow "-" to appear in SDO property names. Would be good to
get that in assuming that it's done in time.

Simon
Caroline Maynard
2007-11-22 13:19:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tom
Post by Matthew Peters
What else should we be fixing as a priority before releasing FULMAR?
if (!class_exists('SCA_Binding_Factory',)) {
if (!class_exists('SCA_Binding_Factory', false)) {
I can imagine what happened :-)

Actually that's quite a common pattern in the SCA code, and presumably
each of its occurrences should be fixed in the same way.
Matthew Peters
2007-11-22 18:18:02 UTC
Permalink
Tom, thanks for spotting that. I fixed it and also at Caroline's
suggestion I looked at the other places and fixed a few others. We
always want to put false on because never want to load a class
inadvertently.

Matthew
Post by Caroline Maynard
Post by Tom
Post by Matthew Peters
What else should we be fixing as a priority before releasing FULMAR?
if (!class_exists('SCA_Binding_Factory',)) {
if (!class_exists('SCA_Binding_Factory', false)) {
I can imagine what happened :-)
Actually that's quite a common pattern in the SCA code, and presumably
each of its occurrences should be fixed in the same way.
Matthew Peters
2007-11-22 19:12:41 UTC
Permalink
Looking through the open defects I think we should fix the following
two soon. We have let them go quiet.

http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=12193 - binding.soap: alphabetical
order of namespaces causes failure
http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=11996 - SCA does not show libxml2
parse errors

Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...